Free Speech In America: Do We Have It? Do We Want It?

“We live in an overheated political and cultural environment, passions are running high, social media gives people a false sense of insulation and even anonymity, and nobody is so perfect that they have not posted or published or engaged in something foolish that they have come to regret. An open society is one that has to deal in second, even third or fourth, chances. In order for this to take place, businesses must stop overreacting to angry, unrepresentative mobs on social media. It is the same instant-reaction mentality driving the awful incentives behind quarterly capitalism. We must learn to think again in the big-picture, and for the long-term. Partisans must also stop engaging in tit-for-tat; we have to have enough people who can stand up and declare that upholding these principles is more important than getting revenge on the other side.”

Read More
Alex Knepper
Lil' Kim and the Donald's Surrealistic Singapore Trip

“Let us recall again that in 1994, President Bill Clinton, in America's first crack at treating the slave-state like a real country, crafted the 'Agreed Framework' with Kim Jung-il. The failed 'framework' promised that the regime would never pursue nuclear weapons. At the time, the deal was made with a very pleasing commencement, and the anointed ones -- the realists, the liberal internationalists, the journalists and pundits -- all told us that the deal represented progress toward peace, that nobody should root against it; that the hawks were proven wrong again, that those telling us we are being conned are rooting against peace, that it really is useful to talk to our enemies. The real mystery today, then, is: Why do people think we have never tried simply talking to the Kim regime before? And why are skeptics of this entire endeavor treated as cynics?”

Read More
Alex Knepper
America's Isolation: Inevitable But Necessary

“It would also be mistaken to blame Trump for America's current isolation, as the pundit class has done ever since the acrimonious conclusion of the recent G-7 meeting. The president is simply carrying out what Americans have voted for for the last two decades. In 2000, George W. Bush promised a more "humble" foreign policy, and ran on ending America's role as the world's policeman. The terrorist attack on 9/11 caused Americans to back a more interventionist foreign policy, but it was a temporary reprieve. In 2008, Barack Obama was able to defeat the Clinton machine and war hero John McCain by promising to bring the troops home and renegotiate NAFTA. Eight years later, and again the candidate who pledged to end free trade and military interventions prevailed over candidates who defended the status quo. If not Trump, someone else with the same foreign policy and trade views would have come along eventually. Washington cannot ignore the will of voters for eternity.”

Read More